|
Author
|
Topic: "Texas Blues"
|
Muddy Lives
Blues Worshipper
Member # 153
|
posted March 12, 2001 12:23 PM
I have been noticing a strange trend in record stores that I frequent. The blues section is often divided into "Blues" and "Texas Blues." The "Texas Blues" section contains the relatively new post-modern hard-driving blues rock bands, while "Blues" has the rest. Where does this come from? I understand that this genre does draw on Texas blues traditions to some degree, especially the "barrelhouse" tradition and classic hard rocking blues pioneers from T-Bone Walker and Gatemouth Brown to Stevie Ray Vaughan. But Texas blues traditions are much broader and richer than the roots of rock. In fact, one very rich Texas tradition could be thought of as the very antithesis of the post-modern blues rock bands: the introspective blues of artists like Blind Lemon Jefferson, Texas Alexander, and Lightnin Hopkins, people who "took their time to play it right" and made an effort to really deliver the message of a blues song. At any rate, it bothers me that the name "Texas Blues," which stands with Mississippi Blues as one of the richest and oldest southern blues traditions, is being co-opted by new blues-rock bands. I have mixed feelings about a number of these bands too. Too often it comes across more as a parody of the blues than the blues itself, frantic tempos, corny swamp echoes lifted from old Excello records, lead guitar licks coming at you continually like from a machine gun, and screeching vocals like fingernails on a blackboard. Certainly, it isn't all bad. But let's not forget the real Texas blues tradition.
Posts: 37 | From: France | Registered: Mar 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|